[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab1e1baf-a30f-97e1-e232-d479eaf52acc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:05:07 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding
On 31/05/17 04:24, Jun Gao wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 16:38 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> g>
>>>
>>> On 26/05/17 09:35, Jun Gao wrote:
>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add MT2701 i2c binding to i2c-mt6577.txt and there is no need to
>>>> modify i2c driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt | 11 ++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
>>>> index 0ce6fa3..52f2023 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt6577.txt
>>>> @@ -4,11 +4,12 @@ The Mediatek's I2C controller is used to interface with I2C devices.
>>>> Required properties:
>>>> - compatible: value should be either of the following.
>>>> - (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
>>>> - (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
>>>> - (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
>>>> - (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
>>>> - (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
>>>> + "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
>>>
>>> I send a cleanup patch for the file, which fixes all the other SoCs.
>>> I can fold this one into it, a soon as I got a Signed-off from the DT
>>> maintainers.
>>
>> I already acked it on the prior versions.
>>
>> Rob
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Which patch should I use now? Or you help to modify dt-binding, I only
> send dtsi file patch ? Thanks!
>
Don't worry, I fixed the commit and took both of them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists