linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] regulator: pfuze100: add fsl,pmic_stby

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170531145536.r2hoeoohc7eiyhw4@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 16:55:36 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <ore@...gutronix.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, linux@...pel-privat.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] regulator: pfuze100: add fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff
 property

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:44:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:14:55AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Document the new optional "fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff" property.
> 
> I'm missing both the cover letter and the rest of the series, what's
> going on with dependencies here?

Hmm... I probably needed to add same list of maintainers to all patches.
I will fix it next time. The patches are here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/olerem/poweroff/

Should I resend it with complete Cc list?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |