There is no such thing as a bad unlock order. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- lib/locking-selftest.c | 29 ----------------------------- 1 file changed, 29 deletions(-) --- a/lib/locking-selftest.c +++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c @@ -516,34 +516,6 @@ GENERATE_TESTCASE(double_unlock_rsem) #undef E /* - * Bad unlock ordering: - */ -#define E() \ - \ - LOCK(A); \ - LOCK(B); \ - UNLOCK(A); /* fail */ \ - UNLOCK(B); - -/* - * 6 testcases: - */ -#include "locking-selftest-spin.h" -GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_spin) -#include "locking-selftest-wlock.h" -GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_wlock) -#include "locking-selftest-rlock.h" -GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_rlock) -#include "locking-selftest-mutex.h" -GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_mutex) -#include "locking-selftest-wsem.h" -GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_wsem) -#include "locking-selftest-rsem.h" -GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_rsem) - -#undef E - -/* * initializing a held lock: */ #define E() \ @@ -1825,7 +1797,6 @@ void locking_selftest(void) DO_TESTCASE_6R("A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock", ABCDBCDA); DO_TESTCASE_6("double unlock", double_unlock); DO_TESTCASE_6("initialize held", init_held); - DO_TESTCASE_6_SUCCESS("bad unlock order", bad_unlock_order); printk(" --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"); print_testname("recursive read-lock");