Message-ID: <592E2CD1.8080206@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 10:39:13 +0800
From:   jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, briannorris@...omium.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, tfiga@...omium.org, zyw@...k-chips.com,
        marcheu@...omium.org, mark.yao@...k-chips.com, hshi@...omium.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
        Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita 
        <marcodiegomesquita@...il.com>,
        Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] drm: Unplug drm device when unregistering it (v8)

Hi Hans,

thanx for investigating :)

On 05/30/2017 03:06 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29-05-17 22:25, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:15:04AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:32:44PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>>>> After unbinding drm, the user space may still owns the drm dev fd, and
>>>> may still be able to call drm ioctl.
>>>>
>>>> We're using an unplugged state to prevent something like that, so let's
>>>> reuse it here.
>>>>
>>>> Also drop drm_unplug_dev, because it would be unused after other
>>>> changes.
>>>>
>>>> Verified on rk3399 chromebook kevin(with cros 4.4 kernel), no more
>>>> crashes
>>>> when unbinding drm with ui service still running.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Fix some commit messages.
>>>> v3: Reuse unplug status.
>>>> v4: Add drm_device_set_plug_state helper.
>>>> v5: Fix hang when unregistering drm dev with open_count 0.
>>>> v6: Move drm_device_set_plug_state into drm_drv.
>>>> v7: Add missing drm_dev_unref in udl_drv.
>>>> v8: Fix compiler errors after enable udl.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi Jeffy,
>>> Given the trouble we've had with this patch already, coupled with the
>>> fact that
>>> unbinding while userspace is active is a contrived/pathological case,
>>> I don't
>>> think it's worth picking this patch upstream.
>>>
>>> If it's really causing issues downstream, you can add my Reviewed-by
>>> for a CHROMIUM
>>> patch, but I'd rather not carry patches in the CrOS repo if we don't
>>> need to.
>>
>> Would a
>>
>> Fixes: a39be606f99d ("drm: Do a full device unregister when unplugging")
>> Reported-by: Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita <marcodiegomesquita@...il.com>
>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>
>> convince us to look into this patch again?
>
> The problem is this patch is wrong, see below.
>
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c     | 26 ++++++++++----------------
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c |  3 ++-
>>>>   include/drm/drmP.h            |  6 ------
>>>>   include/drm/drm_drv.h         |  1 -
>>>>   4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>>> index b5c6bb4..e1da4d1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>>>> @@ -355,22 +355,6 @@ void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>   }
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_put_dev);
>>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> -{
>>>> -    /* for a USB device */
>>>> -    drm_dev_unregister(dev);
>>>> -
>>>> -    mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex);
>>>> -
>>>> -    drm_device_set_unplugged(dev);
>>>> -
>>>> -    if (dev->open_count == 0) {
>>>> -        drm_put_dev(dev);
>>>> -    }
>>>> -    mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex);
>>>> -}
>>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_unplug_dev);
>>>> -
>>>>   /*
>>>>    * DRM internal mount
>>>>    * We want to be able to allocate our own "struct address_space"
>>>> to control
>>>> @@ -733,6 +717,13 @@ static void remove_compat_control_link(struct
>>>> drm_device *dev)
>>>>       kfree(name);
>>>>   }
>>>> +static inline void drm_device_set_plug_state(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>> +                         bool plugged)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    smp_wmb();
>>>> +    atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, !plugged);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   /**
>>>>    * drm_dev_register - Register DRM device
>>>>    * @dev: Device to register
>>>> @@ -787,6 +778,8 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>> unsigned long flags)
>>>>       if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
>>>>           drm_modeset_register_all(dev);
>>>> +    drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, true);
>>>> +
>>>>       ret = 0;
>>>>       DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
>>>> @@ -826,6 +819,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>       drm_lastclose(dev);
>>>>       dev->registered = false;
>>>> +    drm_device_set_plug_state(dev, false);
>>>>       if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
>>>>           drm_modeset_unregister_all(dev);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c
>>>> index cd8b017..fc73e24 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c
>>>> @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static void udl_usb_disconnect(struct
>>>> usb_interface *interface)
>>>>       drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev);
>>>>       udl_fbdev_unplug(dev);
>>>>       udl_drop_usb(dev);
>>>> -    drm_unplug_dev(dev);
>>>> +    drm_dev_unregister(dev);
>>>> +    drm_dev_unref(dev);
>
> The unref here will cause the device struct to get free-ed even if
> userspace still holds references to it through the drm_dev. To fix
> this we would need to call drm_dev_ref on a open from userspace and
> drm_dev_unref from drm_release.

right, but i think we are already did the ref/unref in the open/release 
through drm_minor_acquire/drm_minor_release.

i think the problem would be:
1/ we are trying to unregister&unref when disconnected

2/ the drm_release would try to unregister&unref(by calling drm_put_dev) 
when found it unplugged.

and your patch "drm: Do not call drm_dev_unregister twice on 
drm_unplug_dev" looks like a good way to fix this(to me), maybe we can 
place this patch after yours, and check for open_count here?

-    drm_unplug_dev(dev);
+    if (dev->open_count == 0)
+        drm_dev_unref(dev);


>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>>>>   }
>>>>   /*
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h
>>>> index 3bfafcd..980a204 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/drmP.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
>>>> @@ -488,12 +488,6 @@ static __inline__ int
>>>> drm_core_check_feature(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>       return ((dev->driver->driver_features & feature) ? 1 : 0);
>>>>   }
>>>> -static inline void drm_device_set_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> -{
>>>> -    smp_wmb();
>>>> -    atomic_set(&dev->unplugged, 1);
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>>   static inline int drm_device_is_unplugged(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>   {
>>>>       int ret = atomic_read(&dev->unplugged);
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
>>>> index 0fefc3f..eb63078 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
>>>> @@ -544,7 +544,6 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev);
>>>>   void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev);
>>>>   void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev);
>>>>   void drm_put_dev(struct drm_device *dev);
>>>> -void drm_unplug_dev(struct drm_device *dev);
>>>>   int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name);
>>
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists