linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] regulator: pfuze100: add fsl,pmic_stby

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 16:56:03 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <ore@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, linux@...pel-privat.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] regulator: pfuze100: add fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff
 property

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:44:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm missing both the cover letter and the rest of the series, what's
> > going on with dependencies here?

> Hmm... I probably needed to add same list of maintainers to all patches.
> I will fix it next time. The patches are here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/olerem/poweroff/

> Should I resend it with complete Cc list?

Like I say from my point of view I need to know what the dependencies
are somehow.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)