linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] intel_telemetry_debugfs: fix oops found while load/unload module test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 19:21:57 +0000
From:   "Kushwaha, Priyalee" <priyalee.kushwaha@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Platform Driver" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] intel_telemetry_debugfs: fix oops found while
 load/unload module test

I will resubmit the patch with suggested changes. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevchenko@...il.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 3:52 AM
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>; Kushwaha, Priyalee <priyalee.kushwaha@...el.com>; Chakravarty, Souvik K <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>; Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>; Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>; Brown, Len <len.brown@...el.com>; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] intel_telemetry_debugfs: fix oops found while load/unload module test

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:17:39AM -0700, priyalee.kushwaha@...el.com wrote:

>> +Rafael, Len, Pavel, linux-pm: Is there a preferred approach for 
>> +dealing with
>>                                CONFIG_PM_SLEEP?
>
> Yeah, empty "unregister_pm_notifier" in !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP case sounds 
> like a good idea.

I like the idea, though I would let Rafael to speak up.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko