[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531192355.agnn6qbtdua5lgoy@ninjato>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 21:23:55 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, William wu <wulf@...k-chips.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>,
Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@...sung.com>,
Felix Hädicke <felixhaedicke@....de>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"clemens@...isch.de" <clemens@...isch.de>,
"maksim.salau@...il.com" <maksim.salau@...il.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v3 0/2] usb: Check for DMA capable buffer sanity
> So, if I2C is a bit different, then it might simply make sense to keep
> the function local for I2C now? This seems like a sensible start to me
> meanwhile.
Then again, the DMA API would be for drivers. If the USB core wants to
check for capable buffers, such a helper might be nice nonetheless.
Especially if the USB core needs the check in at least 3 places.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists