[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3gxrkn1TOLWXzW4-s8H8uJWvC1vC3_fjxm-tXXkooxUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 22:25:02 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: s3c64xx: don't select ARM_AMBA from S3C64XX_PL080
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:58:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Yes, selecting ARM_AMBA from drivers is definitely not right; this
> symbol should be selected only by platforms that want AMBA primecell
> bus support, not by drivers, precisely because of these dependency
> issues.
>
> There's another case where ARM_AMBA is selected that probably needs
> fixing - the coresight hwtracing code.
[Adding Mathieu to cc]
Mathieu,
do you remember how we ended up with this?
menuconfig CORESIGHT
bool "CoreSight Tracing Support"
select ARM_AMBA
As Russell says, probably shouldn't select that symbol, most likely
we want either the individual drivers that register an amba_driver to have
a 'depends on ARM_AMBA' or alternatively replace the 'select' with 'depends
on' for the entire subsystem.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists