[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531204913.GC16962@amd>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 22:49:13 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Darwin Dingel <Darwin.Dingel@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"cyrille.pitchen@...el.com" <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com" <mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com>,
"b44839@...escale.com" <b44839@...escale.com>,
"prabhakar@...escale.com" <prabhakar@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: mtd: nand: fsl_ifc: fix handing of bit flips in erased pages
Hi!
> We are also having the same problem where the IFC (nand flash) was
> reporting ECC uncorrectable errors on single bitflips with erased pages.
> Applying this patch with some minor modifications seems to solve our
> issue. We are still doing more testing but recent results looks
> promising.
First, thanks for letting me know.
> Our kernel is 4.4.6 so we have to modify it a bit to fit the old ECC
> layout structure. We just have a few comments about the patch:
>
> > - if (!is_blank(mtd, bufnum))
> > - ctrl->nand_stat |=
> > - IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER;
> > - break;
> > + ctrl->nand_stat |= IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER;
>
> Added 'error = 0' after setting the flag since no error was actually
> corrected.
You meen "errors = 0"? Does that actually make a difference? It is a
local variable, and continue makes sure the value is not used:
for (i = sector; i <= sector_end; i++) {
errors = check_read_ecc(mtd, ctrl, eccstat, i);
if (errors == 15) {
/*
* Uncorrectable error.
* We'll check for blank pages later.
*
* We disable ECCER reporting due to...
* erratum IFC-A002770 -- so report it now if we
* see an uncorrectable error in ECCSTAT.
*/
ctrl->nand_stat |= IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER;
continue;
}
> > - if (ctrl->nand_stat & IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER)
> > - dev_err(priv->dev, "NAND Flash ECC Uncorrectable Error\n");
> > -
> > if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC)
> > mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> > +
> > + if (ctrl->nand_stat & IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER) {
> > + int res;
> > +
> > + if (!oob_required)
> > + fsl_ifc_read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
> > +
> > + res = check_erased_page(chip, buf);
> > + return res;
> > + }
>
> We have to do the check IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER first because the
> condition (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC) will never be
> true since IFC always sets IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER on empty pages.
> Incrementing failed stats first before doing check_erased_page() makes
> nand_read() report ECC error all time.
Yes, you are right; I overlooked that one. Thanks a lot!
> Our exact modification was:
> if (ctrl->nand_stat & IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_ECCER) {
> if (!oob_required)
> fsl_ifc_read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
>
> return check_erased_page(chip, buf);
> }
>
> if (ctrl->nand_stat != IFC_NAND_EVTER_STAT_OPC)
> mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
>
> Because check_erased_page() will be updating the failed stat anyway.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists