[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5A+suW4gS0_7U+g=abvXfFp-bXs5wE1jNPZWwy7HUgSwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 01:07:17 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bai Ping <ping.bai@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: imx6ull should use the same flow as imx6ul
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Leonard Crestez
<leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
> From: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@....com>
>
> This fixes an issue with imx6ull where setting the frequency to 528Mhz
> would actually set the ARM clock to 324Mhz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists