[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531220729.GI20170@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:07:29 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
adharmap@...cinc.com, aghayal@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 15/15] spmi: pmic-arb: instantiate spmi_devices at
arch_initcall
On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> @@ -1384,7 +1384,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> .of_match_table = spmi_pmic_arb_match_table,
> },
> };
> -module_platform_driver(spmi_pmic_arb_driver);
> +
> +int __init spmi_pmic_arb_init(void)
Missing static.
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&spmi_pmic_arb_driver);
> +}
> +arch_initcall(spmi_pmic_arb_init);
We also lost module removal. Probably nobody tests it, but still
no mention of that in commit text.
I'm not sure we need this at all though. Is there something that
needs to probe early? Indicating what that is in the commit text
would be helpful.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists