[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170601010505.jl7dlat3zaaw6osf@lostoracle.net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:05:05 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] KVM: x86: avoid large stack allocations in em_fxrstor
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 07:01:29AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > + size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[16]);
> This still has the same issue (it should be multiplied by 4).
I'm still misunderstanding the math here.
Why multiplied by four, in this case? 8 * 16 / 4 is used in other cases.
Also, previously Radim wrote:
>> + size = offsetof(struct fxregs_state, xmm_space[8]);
> This should be the size of first 8 XMM registers, but xmm_space is of
> type u32, so the correct size is
> xmm_space[8 * 16/sizeof(*fx_state.xmm_space)].
So I think my calculation is off in xmm_offset still? Can we make use
of well-named variables, in place of these constants? Otherwise the math
is hard to follow.
> Thanks Nick for the patches and Radim for the reviews!
> Paolo
Thanks for the code review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists