lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170601223518.GA2780@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:35:18 -0400
From:   Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To:     Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@...dia.com>,
        Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
        Sherry Cheung <SCheung@...dia.com>,
        Subhash Gutti <sgutti@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [HMM 12/15] mm/migrate: new memory migration helper for use with
 device memory v4

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:59:54PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017 13:20:21 -0400
> Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch add a new memory migration helpers, which migrate memory
> > backing a range of virtual address of a process to different memory
> > (which can be allocated through special allocator). It differs from
> > numa migration by working on a range of virtual address and thus by
> > doing migration in chunk that can be large enough to use DMA engine
> > or special copy offloading engine.
> > 
> > Expected users are any one with heterogeneous memory where different
> > memory have different characteristics (latency, bandwidth, ...). As
> > an example IBM platform with CAPI bus can make use of this feature
> > to migrate between regular memory and CAPI device memory. New CPU
> > architecture with a pool of high performance memory not manage as
> > cache but presented as regular memory (while being faster and with
> > lower latency than DDR) will also be prime user of this patch.
> > 
> > Migration to private device memory will be useful for device that
> > have large pool of such like GPU, NVidia plans to use HMM for that.
> > 
> 
> It is helpful, for HMM-CDM however we would like to avoid the downsides
> of MIGRATE_SYNC_NOCOPY

What are the downside you are referring too ?

Cheers,
Jérôme

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ