linux-kernel - Please, consider using lzip instead of xz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <592FF27F.3070104@gnu.org>
Date:   Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:54:55 +0200
From:   Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@....org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:     Antonio Diaz Diaz <antonio@....org>
Subject: Please, consider using lzip instead of xz

(I'm not subscribed to the list. Please CC me.)

Dear Linux developers,

In 2010 Laszlo Ersek recommended[1] the plzip program to compress Linux 
tarballs. However his advice went unnoticed, and Linux developers chose 
xz instead.

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/21/202

Now I would like to present new evidence in favor of Laszlo's 
recommendation. Please, see it at
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html ,
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/lzip_benchmark.html#xz2 and
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/plzip_benchmark.html

Please, could you reconsider your decision and use lzip instead of xz 
for the compression of Linux tarballs?

Thanks,
Antonio.