[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2a3d5383-cab4-6882-4050-c69404bda347@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:39:37 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and
4k)
On 05/29/2017 06:32 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> new = old = pgste_get_lock(ptep);
> pgste_val(new) &= ~(PGSTE_GR_BIT | PGSTE_GC_BIT |
> @@ -748,6 +764,11 @@ int reset_guest_reference_bit(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> ptep = get_locked_pte(mm, addr, &ptl);
> if (unlikely(!ptep))
> return -EFAULT;
> + if (!pgtable_has_pgste(mm, __pa(ptep))) {
> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> + WARN_ONCE(true, "Guest address on page table without pgste");
All these WARN_ONCE. Is there a way how a malicious user can trigger this or is this checked
everywhere and triggered would be indeed a bug?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists