[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170601131232.GA12630@amd>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:12:32 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Darwin Dingel <Darwin.Dingel@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"cyrille.pitchen@...el.com" <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com" <mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com>,
"b44839@...escale.com" <b44839@...escale.com>,
"prabhakar@...escale.com" <prabhakar@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mtd: nand: fsl_ifc: fix handing of bit flips in erased
pages
On Thu 2017-06-01 01:09:17, Darwin Dingel wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Just a minor thing. Sorry about the late comment.
>
> On 01/06/17 08:59, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > +
> > + res = check_erased_page(chip, buf);
> > + return res;
> > + }
>
> Can we just remove 'res' and change this line to:
> return check_erased_page(chip, buf);
Well... I originally had a printk there, and yes, it can be
simplified. I can roll v3, if required, but I'd leave it as is -- it
is still convenient place to add debugging to.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists