linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/annotate: Fix branch instruction with multiple operands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2017 19:17:03 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>, anton@...ba.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, treeze.taeung@...il.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/annotate: Fix branch instruction with multiple
 operands

Thanks Arnaldo,

On Thursday 01 June 2017 06:39 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Humm, authorship info really gests confusing, can't you just have one
> commit log, combining the original one with what you did, and attribute
> the patch to you and have a:
>
> [acme@...et linux]$ git log | grep -i originally-by:  | wc -l
> 58
> [acme@...et linux]$
>
> Originally-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Ravi?
>
> I'm trying to catch up on my patch queue, so haven't read this
> thoroughly to have an idea if this is fair or OK, can you guys comment
> on it?

Yes, I've tested Kim's patch on powerpc and it works for me.

-Ravi