[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170601140048.GA24401@rei.lan>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:00:48 +0200
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Yaogong Wang <wygivan@...gle.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: commit f5f99309 (sock: do not set sk_err in sock_dequeue_err_skb)
has broken ping
Hi!
I've started to wonder why is ping eating 100% CPU shortly after I've
upgraded my machine to 4.10 and here is what I found:
The ping main_loop() sleeps in poll() on its socket, the poll() usually times
out, at least that's what strace suggets which causes ping to sleep for ~1s in
the kernel.
See ping source at:
https://github.com/iputils/iputils/blob/master/ping_common.c#L587
The poll() seems to start returning POLLERR immediatelly after poll() is called
on the socket in a case that connection has dropped for a short while. It seems to be easily reproducible with:
* Starting ping with some ip address i.e. ping 4.2.2.2
* Letting it ping for a minute or so
* Disconnection a WAN cable from your AP
* After a minute or so ping ends up bussy looping on
poll() that returns with POLLERR immediatelly
* After plugging the cable back the problem gets only
worse since we now spend 99% of the time bussy looping
on the poll() syscall
* And my CPU fan starts to scream loudly
I've bisected the problem to this commit:
commit f5f99309fa7481f59a500f0d08f3379cd6424c1f (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Date: Thu Nov 3 18:24:27 2016 -0400
sock: do not set sk_err in sock_dequeue_err_skb
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@...e.cz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists