[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1496331796.890252608@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:43:16 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 191/212] net/packet: fix overflow in check for
tp_frame_nr
3.16.44-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
commit 8f8d28e4d6d815a391285e121c3a53a0b6cb9e7b upstream.
When calculating rb->frames_per_block * req->tp_block_nr the result
can overflow.
Add a check that tp_block_size * tp_block_nr <= UINT_MAX.
Since frames_per_block <= tp_block_size, the expression would
never overflow.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -3854,6 +3854,8 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *
rb->frames_per_block = req->tp_block_size/req->tp_frame_size;
if (unlikely(rb->frames_per_block <= 0))
goto out;
+ if (unlikely(req->tp_block_size > UINT_MAX / req->tp_block_nr))
+ goto out;
if (unlikely((rb->frames_per_block * req->tp_block_nr) !=
req->tp_frame_nr))
goto out;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists