[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <592F8C4B.3080109@163.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 11:38:51 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
To: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>
CC: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Shivasharan Srikanteshwara
<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com,
"PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" <megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] megaraid: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug
On 05/31/2017 06:18 PM, Sumit Saxena wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jia-Ju Bai [mailto:baijiaju1990@....com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:27 AM
>> To: kashyap.desai@...adcom.com; sumit.saxena@...adcom.com;
>> shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com; jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com;
>> martin.petersen@...cle.com
>> Cc: megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jia-Ju Bai
>> Subject: [PATCH] megaraid: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug
>>
>> The driver may sleep under a spin lock, and the function call path is:
>> mraid_mm_attach_buf (acquire the lock by spin_lock_irqsave)
>> pci_pool_alloc(GFP_KERNEL) --> may sleep
>>
>> To fix it, the "GFP_KERNEL" is replaced with "GFP_ATOMIC".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai<baijiaju1990@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c
>> index 4cf9ed9..c43afb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c
>> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@
>>
>> kioc->pool_index = right_pool;
>> kioc->free_buf = 1;
>> - kioc->buf_vaddr = pci_pool_alloc(pool->handle, GFP_KERNEL,
>> + kioc->buf_vaddr = pci_pool_alloc(pool->handle, GFP_ATOMIC,
>> &kioc->buf_paddr);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
> This is very old driver and reached EOL. Did you face any issue because of
> this bug or discover this through code review?
> Anyways patch looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Sumit Saxena<sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>
>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
Hi,
This bug is found by a static analysis tool and my code review.
Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists