linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dmabounce: Improve a size determination in two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d78ce917-3920-7858-b866-48a61b1c8fc3@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:59:55 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        Jörg Rödel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dmabounce: Improve a size determination in two
 functions

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 17:00:17 +0200

Replace the specification of two data structures by pointer dereferences
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c b/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c
index 9b1b7be2ec0e..fcdecb2de242 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c
@@ -123,5 +123,5 @@ alloc_safe_buffer(struct dmabounce_device_info *device_info, void *ptr,
 		pool = NULL;
 	}
 
-	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(struct safe_buffer), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (buf == NULL) {
@@ -487,5 +487,5 @@ int dmabounce_register_dev(struct device *dev, unsigned long small_buffer_size,
 	struct dmabounce_device_info *device_info;
 	int ret;
 
-	device_info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct dmabounce_device_info), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	device_info = kmalloc(sizeof(*device_info), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!device_info) {
-- 
2.13.0