[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1496331655.562149714@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:40:55 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 081/101] net/packet: fix overflow in check for tp_reserve
3.2.89-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
commit bcc5364bdcfe131e6379363f089e7b4108d35b70 upstream.
When calculating po->tp_hdrlen + po->tp_reserve the result can overflow.
Fix by checking that tp_reserve <= INT_MAX on assign.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -3136,6 +3136,8 @@ packet_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, i
return -EBUSY;
if (copy_from_user(&val, optval, sizeof(val)))
return -EFAULT;
+ if (val > INT_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
po->tp_reserve = val;
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists