[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1496331655.562119994@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:40:55 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 058/101] fuse: add missing FR_FORCE
3.2.89-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
commit 2e38bea99a80eab408adee27f873a188d57b76cb upstream.
fuse_file_put() was missing the "force" flag for the RELEASE request when
sending synchronously (fuseblk).
If this flag is not set, then a sync request may be interrupted before it
is dequeued by the userspace filesystem. In this case the OPEN won't be
balanced with a RELEASE.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Fixes: 5a18ec176c93 ("fuse: fix hang of single threaded fuseblk filesystem")
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
- "force" flag is a bitfield
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static void fuse_file_put(struct fuse_fi
struct fuse_req *req = ff->reserved_req;
if (sync) {
+ req->force = 1;
fuse_request_send(ff->fc, req);
path_put(&req->misc.release.path);
fuse_put_request(ff->fc, req);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists