linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 075/101] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1496331655.996662286@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:40:55 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Steffen Klassert" <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        "Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 075/101] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming
 ESN size harder

3.2.89-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>

commit f843ee6dd019bcece3e74e76ad9df0155655d0df upstream.

Kees Cook has pointed out that xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() is subject to
wrapping issues.  To ensure we are correctly ensuring that the two ESN
structures are the same size compare both the overall size as reported
by xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() and the internal length are the same.

CVE-2017-7184
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -390,7 +390,11 @@ static inline int xfrm_replay_verify_len
 	up = nla_data(rp);
 	ulen = xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(up);
 
-	if (nla_len(rp) < ulen || xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen)
+	/* Check the overall length and the internal bitmap length to avoid
+	 * potential overflow. */
+	if (nla_len(rp) < ulen ||
+	    xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen ||
+	    replay_esn->bmp_len != up->bmp_len)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (up->replay_window > up->bmp_len * sizeof(__u32) * 8)