[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e71490ddac65bcf844e277b683ab1795@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 22:36:06 +0530
From: kgunda@...eaurora.org
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
adharmap@...cinc.com, aghayal@....qualcomm.com,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 06/15] spmi: pmic-arb: fix missing interrupts
On 2017-05-31 07:30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote:
>> From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> irq_enable is called when the device resumes. Note that the
>> irq_enable is called regardless of whether the interrupt was
>> marked enabled/disabled in the descriptor or whether it was
>> masked/unmasked at the controller while resuming.
>>
>> The current driver unconditionally clears the interrupt in its
>> irq_enable callback. This is dangerous as any interrupts that
>> happen right before the resume could be missed.
>> Remove the irq_enable callback and use mask/unmask instead.
>>
>> Also remove struct pmic_arb_irq_spec as it serves no real purpose.
>> It is used only in the translate function and the code is much
>> cleaner without it.
>
> Also a separate patch for that part....
>
Sure. will split it in to different patch or move it in the
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9754511/ patch as per your comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 29 +++--------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
>> b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
>> index 0a5728c..bc03737 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
>> @@ -588,17 +588,6 @@ static void qpnpint_irq_unmask(struct irq_data
>> *d)
>> qpnpint_spmi_write(d, QPNPINT_REG_EN_CLR, &data, 1);
>> }
>>
>> -static void qpnpint_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
>> -{
>> - u8 irq = d->hwirq >> 8;
>> - u8 data;
>> -
>> - qpnpint_irq_unmask(d);
>> -
>> - data = BIT(irq);
>> - qpnpint_spmi_write(d, QPNPINT_REG_LATCHED_CLR, &data, 1);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int qpnpint_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int
>> flow_type)
>> {
>> struct spmi_pmic_arb_qpnpint_type type;
>> @@ -647,7 +636,6 @@ static int qpnpint_get_irqchip_state(struct
>> irq_data *d,
>>
>> static struct irq_chip pmic_arb_irqchip = {
>> .name = "pmic_arb",
>> - .irq_enable = qpnpint_irq_enable,
>> .irq_ack = qpnpint_irq_ack,
>> .irq_mask = qpnpint_irq_mask,
>> .irq_unmask = qpnpint_irq_unmask,
>
> This looks ok.
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists