linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 032/101] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB-event processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1496331655.883809248@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:40:55 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Johan Hovold" <johan@...nel.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 032/101] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB-event
 processing

3.2.89-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

commit 2f6821462fe3ace62df3f1b5a9463153e8288298 upstream.

A recent change claimed to fix an off-by-one error in the OOB-port
completion handler, but instead introduced such an error. This could
specifically led to modem-status changes going unnoticed, effectively
breaking TIOCMGET.

Note that the offending commit fixes a loop-condition underflow and is
marked for stable, but should not be backported without this fix.

Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Fixes: 2d380889215f ("USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB data sanity check")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c
@@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ static int digi_read_oob_callback(struct
 		return -1;
 
 	/* handle each oob command */
-	for (i = 0; i < urb->actual_length - 4; i += 4) {
+	for (i = 0; i < urb->actual_length - 3; i += 4) {
 		opcode = buf[i];
 		line = buf[i + 1];
 		status = buf[i + 2];