| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170601120820.3358f7dd@w520.home>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:08:20 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>
Cc: kraxel@...hat.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhiyuan.lv@...el.com,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, zhi.a.wang@...el.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: Adding interface so user space can
get the dma-buf
On Sat, 27 May 2017 16:38:52 +0800
Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> User space should create the management fd for the dma-buf operation first.
> Then user can query the plane information and create dma-buf if necessary
> using the management fd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c | 12 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h | 5 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h | 5 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 169 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
> index c831e91..9759e9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int intel_vgpu_create_dmabuf(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, void *args)
> struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info *gvt_dmabuf = args;
> struct intel_vgpu_fb_info *fb_info;
> int ret;
> + struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj *dmabuf_obj;
>
> ret = intel_vgpu_get_plane_info(dev, vgpu, &gvt_dmabuf->plane_info);
> if (ret != 0)
> @@ -263,6 +264,17 @@ int intel_vgpu_create_dmabuf(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, void *args)
> gvt_vgpu_err("create dma-buf fd failed ret:%d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> + dmabuf_obj = kmalloc(sizeof(*dmabuf_obj), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (dmabuf_obj == NULL) {
> + kfree(fb_info);
> + i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> + gvt_vgpu_err("alloc dmabuf_obj failed\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + dmabuf_obj->obj = obj;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dmabuf_obj->list);
> + list_add_tail(&dmabuf_obj->list, &vgpu->dmabuf_obj_list_head);
> +
> gvt_dmabuf->fd = ret;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h
> index 8be9979..cafa781 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ struct intel_vgpu_fb_info {
> uint32_t fb_size;
> };
>
> +struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> int intel_vgpu_query_plane(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, void *args);
> int intel_vgpu_create_dmabuf(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, void *args);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.c
> index 2032917..dbc3f86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ static const struct intel_gvt_ops intel_gvt_ops = {
> .vgpu_reset = intel_gvt_reset_vgpu,
> .vgpu_activate = intel_gvt_activate_vgpu,
> .vgpu_deactivate = intel_gvt_deactivate_vgpu,
> + .vgpu_query_plane = intel_vgpu_query_plane,
> + .vgpu_create_dmabuf = intel_vgpu_create_dmabuf,
> };
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
> index 763a8c5..a855797 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
> @@ -185,8 +185,11 @@ struct intel_vgpu {
> struct kvm *kvm;
> struct work_struct release_work;
> atomic_t released;
> + struct vfio_device *vfio_device;
> } vdev;
> #endif
> + int dmabuf_mgr_fd;
> + struct list_head dmabuf_obj_list_head;
> };
>
> struct intel_gvt_gm {
> @@ -467,6 +470,8 @@ struct intel_gvt_ops {
> void (*vgpu_reset)(struct intel_vgpu *);
> void (*vgpu_activate)(struct intel_vgpu *);
> void (*vgpu_deactivate)(struct intel_vgpu *);
> + int (*vgpu_query_plane)(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, void *);
> + int (*vgpu_create_dmabuf)(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, void *);
> };
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 389f072..a079080 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/vfio.h>
> #include <linux/mdev.h>
> +#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
>
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "gvt.h"
> @@ -524,6 +525,125 @@ static int intel_vgpu_reg_init_opregion(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int kvmgt_get_vfio_device(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> +
> + device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(mdev_dev(vgpu->vdev.mdev));
> + if (device == NULL)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + vgpu->vdev.vfio_device = device;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvmgt_put_vfio_device(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> +{
> + vfio_device_put(vgpu->vdev.vfio_device);
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_mmap(struct file *file,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + return -EPERM;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_release(struct inode *inode,
> + struct file *filp)
> +{
> + struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = filp->private_data;
> + struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj *obj;
> + struct list_head *pos;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!vgpu->vdev.vfio_device))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + list_for_each(pos, &vgpu->dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
> + obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, list);
> + if (WARN_ON(!obj))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + kfree(obj->obj->gvt_info);
> + i915_gem_object_put(obj->obj);
> + kfree(obj);
> + kvmgt_put_vfio_device(vgpu);
Can we do this? If I understand, we're releasing all the references
and allocations for the dmabuf fds on release of the manager fd. What
happens if the user continues trying to access those dmabuf fds after
this?
> + }
> + kvmgt_put_vfio_device(vgpu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = filp->private_data;
> + int minsz;
> + int ret;
> + struct fd f;
> +
> + f = fdget(vgpu->dmabuf_mgr_fd);
> + if (!f.file)
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + if (ioctl == VFIO_DEVICE_QUERY_PLANE) {
> + struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info info;
> +
> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_vgpu_plane_info, resv);
> + if (copy_from_user(&info, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + if (info.argsz < minsz) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + ret = intel_gvt_ops->vgpu_query_plane(vgpu, &info);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + fdput(f);
> + gvt_vgpu_err("query plane failed:%d\n", ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + fdput(f);
> + return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz) ?
> + -EFAULT : 0;
> + } else if (ioctl == VFIO_DEVICE_CREATE_DMABUF) {
> + struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info dmabuf;
> +
> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_vgpu_dmabuf_info, resv);
> + if (copy_from_user(&dmabuf, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + if (dmabuf.argsz < minsz) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + ret = kvmgt_get_vfio_device(vgpu);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return ret;
Missed an fdput, though I'm not sure I understand the value of the
original fdget or the dmabuf_mgr_fd field at all. dmabuf_mgr_fd is
only used here, presumably to add a reference to the fd while we're in
the ioctl, but we're in the ioctl function of that fd, so I think there
are already references elsewhere.
> +
> + ret = intel_gvt_ops->vgpu_create_dmabuf(vgpu, &dmabuf);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + kvmgt_put_vfio_device(vgpu);
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EINVAL;
Why not return the errno that vgpu_create_dmabuf provided?
> + }
> + fdput(f);
> + return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &dmabuf, minsz) ?
> + -EFAULT : 0;
> + }
> +
> + fdput(f);
> + gvt_vgpu_err("unsupported dmabuf operation\n");
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_ops = {
> + .release = intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_release,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_ioctl,
> + .mmap = intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_mmap,
> + .llseek = noop_llseek,
> +};
> static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = NULL;
> @@ -1259,6 +1379,30 @@ static long intel_vgpu_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
> } else if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_RESET) {
> intel_gvt_ops->vgpu_reset(vgpu);
> return 0;
> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_GET_FD) {
> + int fd;
> + u32 type;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&type, (void __user *)arg, sizeof(type)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (type != VFIO_DEVICE_DMABUF_MGR_FD)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = kvmgt_get_vfio_device(vgpu);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + fd = anon_inode_getfd("intel-vgpu-dmabuf-mgr-fd",
> + &intel_vgpu_dmabuf_mgr_fd_ops,
> + vgpu, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + gvt_vgpu_err("create dmabuf mgr fd failed\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
Error path leaks vfio_device reference.
> + }
> + vgpu->dmabuf_mgr_fd = fd;
As above, unclear value of this field, additionally, what if the user
calls VFIO_DEVICE_GET_FD more than once?
> +
> + return fd;
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
> index 6e3cbd8..af6fc74 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu *__intel_gvt_create_vgpu(struct intel_gvt *gvt,
> vgpu->gvt = gvt;
> vgpu->sched_ctl.weight = param->weight;
> bitmap_zero(vgpu->tlb_handle_pending, I915_NUM_ENGINES);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vgpu->dmabuf_obj_list_head);
>
> intel_vgpu_init_cfg_space(vgpu, param->primary);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists