lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e95a3b2-2922-f5f7-f424-7ae0639b6e68@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:41:24 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com,
        luto@...capital.net, efault@....de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/17] cgroup: Implement new thread mode semantics

On 06/01/2017 10:50 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Waiman.
>
> A short update.  I tried making root special while keeping the
> existing threaded semantics but I didn't really like it because we
> have to couple controller enables/disables with threaded
> enables/disables.  I'm now trying a simpler, albeit a bit more
> tedious, approach which should leave things mostly symmetrical.  I'm
> hoping to be able to post mostly working patches this week.

I am looking forward to your patches.

> Also, do you mind posting the debug patches as a separate series?
> Let's get the bits which make sense indepdently in the tree.

I am going to do that. The debug patches, however, will have dependency
on other cgroup patches and so will need to be posted after the core
patches.

Cheers,
Longman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ