[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4955fa27-2daf-b80f-c37f-35489c63b599@ginzinger.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:07:46 +0200
From: Henri Roosen <henri.roosen@...zinger.com>
To: <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: <ohad@...ery.com>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Release rpmsg devices in backends
> The rpmsg devices are allocated in the backends and as such must be
> freed there as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c
> index beaef5dd973e..a0a39a8821a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c
> @@ -969,6 +969,14 @@ static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops qcom_smd_endpoint_ops = {
> .poll = qcom_smd_poll,
> };
>
> +static void qcom_smd_release_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> + struct qcom_smd_device *qsdev = to_smd_device(rpdev);
> +
> + kfree(qsdev);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Create a smd client device for channel that is being opened.
> */
> @@ -998,6 +1006,7 @@ static int qcom_smd_create_device(struct qcom_smd_channel *channel)
>
> rpdev->dev.of_node = qcom_smd_match_channel(edge->of_node, channel->name);
> rpdev->dev.parent = &edge->dev;
> + rpdev->dev.release = qcom_smd_release_device;
>
> return rpmsg_register_device(rpdev);
This will not work: the registration of qcom_smd_release_device at
rpdev->dev.release gets overwritten inside rpmsg_register_device() and
will then point to the function rpmsg_release_device().
My suggestion would be to additionally change/fix
rpmsg_register_device() so it will not overwrite the release callback.
> }
> @@ -1013,6 +1022,8 @@ static int qcom_smd_create_chrdev(struct qcom_smd_edge *edge)
> qsdev->edge = edge;
> qsdev->rpdev.ops = &qcom_smd_device_ops;
> qsdev->rpdev.dev.parent = &edge->dev;
> + qsdev->rpdev.dev.release = qcom_smd_release_device;
> +
> return rpmsg_chrdev_register_device(&qsdev->rpdev);
This will not work either: same reason as described above because
rpmsg_chrdev_register_device() will call rpmsg_register_device().
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> index 5e66e081027e..7f8c5cc1c118 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> @@ -360,6 +360,14 @@ static const struct rpmsg_device_ops virtio_rpmsg_ops = {
> .announce_destroy = virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy,
> };
>
> +static void virtio_rpmsg_release_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> + struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> +
> + kfree(vch);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * create an rpmsg channel using its name and address info.
> * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic
> @@ -408,6 +416,7 @@ static struct rpmsg_device *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> strncpy(rpdev->id.name, chinfo->name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
>
> rpdev->dev.parent = &vrp->vdev->dev;
> + rpdev->dev.release = virtio_rpmsg_release_device;
> ret = rpmsg_register_device(rpdev);
The same issue as described above.
> if (ret)
> return NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists