[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170602134702.GQ1293@mail.corp.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:47:03 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Report power supply from hid-logitech-hidpp
On Jun 02 2017 or thereabouts, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 09:29 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >
> <snip>
> > Bastien, is is possible to have a simple udev rule that tells upower
> > to
> > ignore the battery device if builtin_power_supply is there?
> > That way we can tell people running old upower to use this to be sure
> > to
> > ignore the kernel device and just rely on the upower hidpp support?
>
> I'm not sure where we'd ship that in a way that would make it work
> differently based on the version of UPower. In UPower? Well, UPower
> 0.99.x is the stable track for UPower, and the git master already has
> support for this feature.
>
> I'm not sure what else would need to be done.
I was more thinking at a snippet that we drop on this mailing list
(here) that users can carefully copy/paste in their /etc and remove
themself once they upgrade the system.
Though OTOH, that's relying on users remembering that they have a
special conf that need to be removed in a later update.
Cheers,
Benjamin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists