lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rSNdTYK2GiazG0y_9POnBf__=puWJwrtKVptZxBXNiaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:46:43 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: get_random_bytes returns bad randomness
 before seeding is complete

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com> wrote:
> One of the early uses is initializing the stack canary value for SSP in
> very early boot. If that blocks, it's going to be blocking nearly
> anything else from happening.
>
> On x86, that's only the initial canary since the per-task canaries end
> up being used, but elsewhere at least without SMP disabled or changes to
> GCC that's all there is so the entropy matters.

If this is the case, then we simply need a function called
get_random_bytes_but_potentially_crappy_ones_because_we_are_desperate_for_anything(),
which would respond with a weaker guarantee than that
get_random_bytes(), which the documentation says always returns
cryptographically secure numbers.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ