[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <180d8e76-fa00-b138-0d5f-720b116228b8@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:36:17 -0700
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>,
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] ARC: [plat-eznps] spinlock aware for MTM
On 05/27/2017 11:52 PM, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
>
> This way when we execute "ex" during trying to hold lock we can switch to
> other HW thread and utilize the core intead of just spinning on a lock.
>
> We noticed about 10% improvement of execution time with hackbench test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 233d5ff..0a54ce7 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -252,9 +252,15 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> "1: ex %0, [%1] \n"
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EZNPS_MTM_EXT
> + " .word %3 \n"
> +#endif
> " breq %0, %2, 1b \n"
> : "+&r" (val)
> : "r"(&(lock->slock)), "ir"(__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_LOCKED__)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EZNPS_MTM_EXT
> + , "i"(CTOP_INST_SCHD_RW)
> +#endif
> : "memory");
>
> /*
>
This is ugly - I will fix it up here to create an NPS version of arch_spin_lock !
-Vineet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists