linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: Use first level PMIC thermal irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAENHMvMF8yOsezMRSYp+4TsVTD9Nnbfm8LJWuX7YccbSL+bsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:53:09 -0700
From:   Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
        "dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: Use first level
 PMIC thermal irq

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
> <sathyaosid@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:37 AM,
>>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> PMIC mfd driver only exports first level irq for thermal device.
>>>> But currently we are reading the irqs from the second level irq
>>>> chip, So this patch fixes this issue by adding support to use
>>>> first level PMIC thermal irq.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Shouldn't be this squashed to patch 2?
>>
>> There is no compilation dependency between patch 2 and 3. But they are
>> functionally dependent.
>>
>> Should we squash functionally dependent patches too ?
>
> Let's assume we applied patches 1 and 2, does it mean the regression
> to the existing behaviour?

Yes, Just applying patch 1 & 2 and not apply patch 3 will create
regression in thermal driver.

Since there is no compilation dependency between patch 2 & 3 and they
are from two different domains, I submitted them separately to make it
easier for review.



>
> (For example, device worked improperly in some cases -> stopped
> working completely)
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko



-- 
Sathya