[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170603230048.52b7f111@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:00:48 +0100
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Matt Brown <matt@...tt.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] security: tty: make
TIOCSTI ioctl require CAP_SYS_ADMIN
> TIOCSLCKTRMIOS
That one I'm more dubious about
> TIOCSLTC
> TIOCSSOFTCAR
tty_io.c also has a few and n_tty has a couple we'd want.
>
> would it be overkill to have a sysctl kernel.ttyioctlwhitelist.X where X
> is one of the ioctls above?
Why would anyone want to change the entries on that list
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists