[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170604162705.6pv6wbgfyogzsmg5@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 19:27:05 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Implement request_locality
function.
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 06:43:32PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:34:31PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 05/24/2017 08:09 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:03:27PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > On 05/24/2017 06:21 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:39:40PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > > > Implement the request_locality function. To set the locality on the
> > > > > > backend we define vendor-specific TPM 1.2 and TPM 2 ordinals and send
> > > > > > a command to the backend to set the locality for the next commands.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To avoid recursing into requesting the locality, we set the
> > > > > > TPM_TRANSMIT_RAW flag when calling tpm_transmit_cmd. To avoid recursing
> > > > > > into TPM 2 space related commands, we set the space parameter to NULL.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 1 +
> > > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > include/uapi/linux/vtpm_proxy.h | 4 ++++
> > > > > > 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > > > > index 2eacda2..876d45f 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > > > > @@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ ssize_t tpm_transmit_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_space *space,
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_transmit_cmd);
> > > > > > #define TPM_DIGEST_SIZE 20
> > > > > > #define TPM_RET_CODE_IDX 6
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c
> > > > > > index 751059d..66024bf 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c
> > > > > > @@ -371,6 +371,41 @@ static bool vtpm_proxy_tpm_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status)
> > > > > > return ret;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > +static int vtpm_proxy_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int locality)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct tpm_buf buf;
> > > > > > + int rc;
> > > > > > + const struct tpm_output_header *header;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > > > > > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS,
> > > > > > + TPM2_CC_SET_LOCALITY);
> > > > > I would always go with this branch.
> > > > >
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM_TAG_RQU_COMMAND,
> > > > > > + TPM_ORD_SET_LOCALITY);
> > > > > > + if (rc)
> > > > > > + return rc;
> > > > > > + tpm_buf_append_u8(&buf, locality);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, tpm_buf_length(&buf), 0,
> > > > > > + TPM_TRANSMIT_UNLOCKED | TPM_TRANSMIT_RAW,
> > > > > > + "attempting to set locality");
> > > > > > + if (rc < 0) {
> > > > > > + locality = rc;
> > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + header = (const struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
> > > > > > + rc = be32_to_cpu(header->return_code);
> > > > > > + if (rc)
> > > > > > + locality = -1;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +out:
> > > > > > + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return locality;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > static const struct tpm_class_ops vtpm_proxy_tpm_ops = {
> > > > > > .flags = TPM_OPS_AUTO_STARTUP,
> > > > > > .recv = vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_recv,
> > > > > > @@ -380,6 +415,7 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops vtpm_proxy_tpm_ops = {
> > > > > > .req_complete_mask = VTPM_PROXY_REQ_COMPLETE_FLAG,
> > > > > > .req_complete_val = VTPM_PROXY_REQ_COMPLETE_FLAG,
> > > > > > .req_canceled = vtpm_proxy_tpm_req_canceled,
> > > > > > + .request_locality = vtpm_proxy_request_locality,
> > > > > > };
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vtpm_proxy.h b/include/uapi/linux/vtpm_proxy.h
> > > > > > index a69e991..58ac73c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vtpm_proxy.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vtpm_proxy.h
> > > > > > @@ -46,4 +46,8 @@ struct vtpm_proxy_new_dev {
> > > > > > #define VTPM_PROXY_IOC_NEW_DEV _IOWR(0xa1, 0x00, struct vtpm_proxy_new_dev)
> > > > > > +/* vendor specific commands to set locality */
> > > > > > +#define TPM2_CC_SET_LOCALITY 0x20001000
> > > > > > +#define TPM_ORD_SET_LOCALITY 0x20001000
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VTPM_PROXY_H */
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.4.3
> > > > > What practical benefit you get from these two constants? I understand
> > > > > the value range but not so much the redundant code.
> > > > If you want to change this, please go ahead and give it a sinle name.
> > > > For the code branches above I think that we should at least send a TPM 1.2
> > > > formatted command in case of TPM 1.2 and a TPM 2 formatted one in case of
> > > > TPM 2. It seems just 'proper.'
> > > >
> > > > Stefan
> > > Agreed. I will make these changes no need to send new series.
> >
> > I pushed an update to the test suite, which may help the cause to accept
> > this series.
> >
> > https://github.com/stefanberger/linux-vtpm-tests
> >
> > Patch 3/3 should probably not return -EFAULT in case of the user trying to
> > send the SetLocality command via /dev/tpm%d but rather -EPIPE to get the
> > logging of the error suppressed, even though that doesn't seem to be the
> > right error code.
> >
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > /Jarkko
> > >
>
> On hold as there are more high priority bug fixes in the queue.
>
> /Jarkko
Patches are now applied to master (bleeding edge) brach. After they are
tested they can be put also to the next branch.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists