linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:51:19 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:

SNBIP

> > I started fixing it some time ago, but got distracted, if you are
> > interested, you're welcome to pick up from my branch ;-)
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> >   perf/attr_test
> > 
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> > 
> 
> I have started work on perf tool very recently to get s390 support
> working and up to date.
> 
> I downloaded your branch and discovered you have already fixed
> another issue I run into this week. For example 
> commit 070b9644981e ("perf tests attr: Do not store failed events")
> 
> I can certainly help you to get this test case operational again.
> Maybe you need to pull some of your patches out of your backlog
> and submit them the kernel to get to a common base to work on.
> 
> I suggest we should move the discussion to the linux-perf-users
> mailing list.
> 
> Your thoughts?

good idea, for me it'd be best if you pull them and change them
as you see fit.. I dont think I'll get to it any time soon

thanks,
jirka