linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: refactor mem_cgroup_resize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:09:42 +0300
From:   Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
To:     Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        n.borisov.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: refactor mem_cgroup_resize_limit()

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:04:37PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> @@ -2498,22 +2449,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		}
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&memcg_limit_mutex);
> -		if (limit < memcg->memory.limit) {
> +		inverted = memsw ? limit < memcg->memory.limit :
> +				   limit > memcg->memsw.limit;
> +		if (inverted)
>  			mutex_unlock(&memcg_limit_mutex);
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			break;
>  		}

For some reason, I liked this patch more without this extra variable :-)