[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <593509FB.3070605@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:36:27 +0800
From: Jay Zhou <jianjay.zhou@...wei.com>
To: <guangrong.xiao@...il.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<mtosatti@...hat.com>, <avi.kivity@...il.com>, <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
CC: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 2017/5/3 18:52, guangrong.xiao@...il.com wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
>
> Background
> ==========
> The original idea of this patchset is from Avi who raised it in
> the mailing list during my vMMU development some years ago
>
> This patchset introduces a extremely fast way to write protect
> all the guest memory. Comparing with the ordinary algorithm which
> write protects last level sptes based on the rmap one by one,
> it just simply updates the generation number to ask all vCPUs
> to reload its root page table, particularly, it can be done out
> of mmu-lock, so that it does not hurt vMMU's parallel. It is
> the O(1) algorithm which does not depends on the capacity of
> guest's memory and the number of guest's vCPUs
>
> Implementation
> ==============
> When write protect for all guest memory is required, we update
> the global generation number and ask vCPUs to reload its root
> page table by calling kvm_reload_remote_mmus(), the global number
> is protected by slots_lock
>
> During reloading its root page table, the vCPU checks root page
> table's generation number with current global number, if it is not
> matched, it makes all the entries in the shadow page readonly and
> directly go to VM. So the read access is still going on smoothly
> without KVM's involvement and write access triggers page fault
>
> If the page fault is triggered by write operation, KVM moves the
> write protection from the upper level to the lower level page - by
> making all the entries in the lower page readonly first then make
> the upper level writable, this operation is repeated until we meet
> the last spte
>
> In order to speed up the process of making all entries readonly, we
> introduce possible_writable_spte_bitmap which indicates the writable
> sptes and possiable_writable_sptes which is a counter indicating the
> number of writable sptes in the shadow page, they work very efficiently
> as usually only one entry in PML4 ( < 512 G),few entries in PDPT (one
> entry indicates 1G memory), PDEs and PTEs need to be write protected for
> the worst case. Note, the number of page fault and TLB flush are the same
> as the ordinary algorithm
>
> Performance Data
> ================
> Case 1) For a VM which has 3G memory and 12 vCPUs, we noticed that:
> a: the time required for dirty log (ns)
> before after
> 64289121 137654 +46603%
>
> b: the performance of memory write after dirty log, i.e, the dirty
> log path is not parallel with page fault, the time required to
> write all 3G memory for all vCPUs in the VM (ns):
> before after
> 281735017 291150923 -3%
> We think the impact, 3%, is acceptable, particularly, mmu-lock
> contention is not take into account in this case
>
> Case 2) For a VM which has 30G memory and 8 vCPUs, we do the live
> migration, at the some time, a test case which greedily and repeatedly
> writes 3000M memory in the VM.
>
> 2.1) for the new booted VM, i.e, page fault is required to map guest
> memory in, we noticed that:
> a: the dirty page rate (pages):
> before after
> 333092 497266 +49%
> that means, the performance for the being migrated VM is hugely
> improved as the contention on mmu-lock is reduced
>
> b: the time to complete live migration (ms):
> before after
> 12532 18467 -47%
> not surprise, the time required to complete live migration is
> increased as the VM is able to generate more dirty pages
>
> 2.2) pre-write the VM first, then run the test case and do live
> migration, i.e, no much page faults are needed to map guest
> memory in, we noticed that:
> a: the dirty page rate (pages):
> before after
> 447435 449284 +0%
>
> b: time time to complete live migration (ms)
> before after
> 31068 28310 +10%
> under this case, we also noticed that the time of dirty log for
> the first time, before the patchset is 156 ms, after that, only
> 6 ms is needed
>
> The patch applied to QEMU
> =========================
> The draft patch is attached to enable this functionality in QEMU:
>
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index 90b8573..9ebe1ac 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ bool kvm_direct_msi_allowed;
> bool kvm_ioeventfd_any_length_allowed;
> bool kvm_msi_use_devid;
> static bool kvm_immediate_exit;
> +static bool kvm_write_protect_all;
>
> static const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_required_capabilites[] = {
> KVM_CAP_INFO(USER_MEMORY),
> @@ -440,6 +441,26 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(MemoryRegionSection *section,
>
> #define ALIGN(x, y) (((x)+(y)-1) & ~((y)-1))
>
> +static bool kvm_write_protect_all_is_supported(KVMState *s)
> +{
> + return kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_WRITE_PROTECT_ALL_MEM) &&
> + kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_DIRTY_LOG_WITHOUT_WRITE_PROTECT);
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_write_protect_all_mem(bool write)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!kvm_write_protect_all)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_WRITE_PROTECT_ALL_MEM, !!write);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + printf("ioctl failed %d\n", errno);
> + abort();
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap - Grab dirty bitmap from kernel space
> * This function updates qemu's dirty bitmap using
> @@ -490,6 +511,7 @@ static int kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
> memset(d.dirty_bitmap, 0, allocated_size);
>
> d.slot = mem->slot | (kml->as_id << 16);
> + d.flags = kvm_write_protect_all ? KVM_DIRTY_LOG_WITHOUT_WRITE_PROTECT : 0;
> if (kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d) == -1) {
> DPRINTF("ioctl failed %d\n", errno);
> ret = -1;
> @@ -1622,6 +1644,9 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
> }
>
> kvm_immediate_exit = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IMMEDIATE_EXIT);
> + kvm_write_protect_all = kvm_write_protect_all_is_supported(s);
> + printf("Write protect all is %s.\n", kvm_write_protect_all ? "supported" : "unsupported");
> + memory_register_write_protect_all(kvm_write_protect_all_mem);
> s->nr_slots = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
>
> /* If unspecified, use the default value */
> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> index 4e082a8..7c056ef 100644
> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -443,9 +443,12 @@ struct kvm_interrupt {
> };
>
> /* for KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG */
> +
> +#define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_WITHOUT_WRITE_PROTECT 0x1
> +
> struct kvm_dirty_log {
> __u32 slot;
> - __u32 padding1;
> + __u32 flags;
> union {
> void *dirty_bitmap; /* one bit per page */
> __u64 padding2;
> @@ -884,6 +887,9 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
> #define KVM_CAP_PPC_MMU_HASH_V3 135
> #define KVM_CAP_IMMEDIATE_EXIT 136
>
> +#define KVM_CAP_X86_WRITE_PROTECT_ALL_MEM 144
> +#define KVM_CAP_X86_DIRTY_LOG_WITHOUT_WRITE_PROTECT 145
> +
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>
> struct kvm_irq_routing_irqchip {
> @@ -1126,6 +1132,7 @@ enum kvm_device_type {
> struct kvm_userspace_memory_region)
> #define KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR _IO(KVMIO, 0x47)
> #define KVM_SET_IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR _IOW(KVMIO, 0x48, __u64)
> +#define KVM_WRITE_PROTECT_ALL_MEM _IO(KVMIO, 0x49)
>
> /* enable ucontrol for s390 */
> struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping {
> diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
> index 4c95aaf..b836675 100644
> --- a/memory.c
> +++ b/memory.c
> @@ -809,6 +809,13 @@ static void address_space_update_ioeventfds(AddressSpace *as)
> flatview_unref(view);
> }
>
> +static write_protect_all_fn write_func;
I think there should be a declaration in memory.h,
diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
index 7fc3f48..31f3098 100644
--- a/include/exec/memory.h
+++ b/include/exec/memory.h
@@ -1152,6 +1152,9 @@ void memory_global_dirty_log_start(void);
*/
void memory_global_dirty_log_stop(void);
+typedef void (*write_protect_all_fn)(bool write);
+void memory_register_write_protect_all(write_protect_all_fn func);
+
void mtree_info(fprintf_function mon_printf, void *f);
--
Best Regards,
Jay Zhou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists