[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG9sBKNKTT8ceHrXRhLRns53ejH0kwaLMy-qAzdmo=Hy5h02Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:30:14 +0300
From: Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
Cc: yuval.shaia@...cle.com, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] rxe: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in post_one_send
> - if (qp->is_user && copy_from_user(p, (__user void *)
> - (uintptr_t)sge->addr, sge->length))
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qp->sq.sq_lock, *flags);
> + err = copy_from_user(p, (__user void *)
> + (uintptr_t)sge->addr, sge->length);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&qp->sq.sq_lock, *flags);
> + if (qp->is_user && err)
> return -EFAULT;
qp-_is_user is always false in this function (flow starts from
rxe_post_send_kernel) so this line is a dead code
In fact, this patch seems to add a serious bug when it uses
copy_from_user() from a non user pointer.
Do you agree?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists