[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c5989b7-c5b4-6602-5b09-46277860653e@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:54:40 +0100
From: Anoob Soman <anoob.soman@...rix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-evtchn: Bind dyn evtchn:qemu-dm interrupt to next
online VCPU
On 02/06/17 16:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> I'd prefer the to have irq disabled from taking the lock until here.
> This will avoid problems due to preemption and will be faster as it
> avoids one irq on/off cycle. So:
>
> local_irq_disable();
> raw_spin_lock();
> ...
> raw_spin_unlock();
> this_cpu_write();
> xen_rebind_evtchn_to_cpu();
> local_irq_enable();
>
>
> Juergen
Agreed, I will send a V2 with your suggestion.
-Anoob.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists