lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABeRdtoEi+21mzz0h0s9qfYGtnAr4N4AK3PHNcNxv_4A89s=Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2017 19:05:40 +0900
From:   Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@...il.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: LPAE: kexec: clear TTBCR.T1SZ explicitly when
 PHYS_OFFSET > PAGE_OFFSET

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:22:20PM +0900, Hoeun Ryu wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S
>> index 5e5720e..9ac2bec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S
>> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_v7_set_pte_ext)
>>        * otherwise booting secondary CPUs would end up using TTBR1 for the
>>        * identity mapping set up in TTBR0.
>>        */
>> +     bichi   \tmp, \tmp, #(1 << 16)                          @ clear TTBCR.T1SZ
>
> This looks insufficient.  There's two bits here:
>
>  * TTBR0/TTBR1 split (PAGE_OFFSET):
>  *   0x40000000: T0SZ = 2, T1SZ = 0 (not used)
>  *   0x80000000: T0SZ = 0, T1SZ = 1
>  *   0xc0000000: T0SZ = 0, T1SZ = 2
>
> but you seem to only be clearing one bit.

Oh, I'm sorry for the mistake, I'll fix this like #(7 << 16) in v2.
(There're 3 bits in TxSZ)
Thank you for the review.

>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ