[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1496661424.31588.1.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 21:17:04 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2] powerpc: handle simultaneous interrupts at once
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 20:21 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 08:55:45 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > It often happens to have simultaneous interrupts, for instance
> > when having double Ethernet attachment. With the current
> > implementation, we suffer the cost of kernel entry/exit for each
> > interrupt.
> >
> > This patch introduces a loop in __do_irq() to handle all interrupts
> > at once before returning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>
> Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/45cb08f4791ce6a15c54598b4cb73d
Hrm, I hadn't noticed that patch...
We used to do that and then removed the code for it. There's a cost,
sometimes noticeable, to an extra call to ppc_md.get_irq.
Why not have your get_irq (or eoi) implementation set a per-cpu
requesting a new spin of the loop ?
We could move the xive force replay stuff to use the same thing.
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists