[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <398638390.74484157.1496662780144.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:39:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marta Rybczynska <mrybczyn@...ray.eu>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: keith busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, axboe@...com, hch@....de,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-rdma: remove race conditions from IB signalling
>> -static inline int nvme_rdma_queue_sig_limit(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue)
>> +static inline int nvme_rdma_init_sig_count(int queue_size)
>> {
>> - int sig_limit;
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * We signal completion every queue depth/2 and also handle the
>> - * degenerated case of a device with queue_depth=1, where we
>> - * would need to signal every message.
>> + /* We want to signal completion at least every queue depth/2.
>> + * This returns the largest power of two that is not above half
>> + * of (queue size + 1) to optimize (avoid divisions).
>> */
>> - sig_limit = max(queue->queue_size / 2, 1);
>> - return (++queue->sig_count % sig_limit) == 0;
>> + return 1 << ilog2((queue_size + 1) / 2);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool nvme_rdma_queue_sig_limit(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue)
>> +{
>> + int count, limit;
>> +
>> + limit = nvme_rdma_init_sig_count(queue->queue_size);
>
> Why calling it init? you're not initializing anything...
>
> I'd just call it nvme_rdma_sig_limit()
>
>> + count = atomic_inc_return(&queue->sig_count);
>> +
>> + /* Signal if count is a multiple of limit */
>> + if ((count & (limit - 1)) == 0)
>> + return true;
>> + return false;
>> }
>
> You can replace it with:
> return (atomic_inc_return(&queue->sig_count) & (limit - 1)) == 0;
>
> And lose the local count variable.
The init part is a leftover from one of the previous versions and we do not need
the value anywhere else. As the sig_limit() function is quite short now it I can
also put the ilog part + comments in the same place too. Wouldn't it be easier
to read?
Marta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists