lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:48:37 +0000
From:   Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...marydata.com>
To:     "baijiaju1990@....com" <baijiaju1990@....com>,
        "anna.schumaker@...app.com" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: nfs: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in
 nfs_access_add_cache

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 16:05 +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The driver may sleep under a rcu read lock, and function call path
> is:
> nfs_permission (acquire the lock by rcu_read_lock)
>   nfs_do_access
>     nfs_access_add_cache
>       kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) --> may sleep
> 
> To fix it, "GFP_KERNEL" is replaced with "GFP_ATOMIC".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/dir.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> index 32ccd77..7a074db 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ static void nfs_access_add_rbtree(struct inode
> *inode, struct nfs_access_entry *
>  
>  void nfs_access_add_cache(struct inode *inode, struct
> nfs_access_entry *set)
>  {
> -	struct nfs_access_entry *cache = kmalloc(sizeof(*cache),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct nfs_access_entry *cache = kmalloc(sizeof(*cache),
> GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (cache == NULL)
>  		return;
>  	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&cache->rb_node);

The RCU locked codepath will not ever hit nfs_access_add_rbtree(). It
returns with an error code of -ECHILD after the test of "may_block".

Cheers
  Trond
-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@...marydata.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ