[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170606002914.695e9c0b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:29:14 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new tree for linux-next: uuid
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:06:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 10:07 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Meh, thanks. This has been throught the buildbot countless times
> > without a report. But I guess a less generic name might be a good
> > idea to start with.
> >
> > Andy: do you think UUID_INIT/GUID_INIT make sense to your?
> > or _INITIALIZER?
>
> I'm a bit out of context. Where this will be used?
include/uapi/linux/uuid.h (after the uuid lib changes) contains a
definition of the macro GUID() which is probably a bit generic a name
for a uapi include file. It also clashes with a couple of other uses
of that macro name already in the kernel (one of which produced several
warnings in linux-next today).
It produces an initializer for a guid_t (structure).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists