linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8cbe8fb-50fd-76ef-a5e3-59a7913622c5@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:07:37 +0530
From:   Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     <tony@...mide.com>, <milo.kim@...com>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device_id



On Monday 05 June 2017 04:07 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jun 2017, Keerthy wrote:
> 
>> With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id
>> is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new
>> instead of probe. 
>>
>> Keerthy (9):
>>   mfd: tps65217: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps65218: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: palmas: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: lp873x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: lp8788: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: lp3943: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps65086: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps65090: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps6586x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>
>>  drivers/mfd/lp3943.c   | 11 ++---------
>>  drivers/mfd/lp873x.c   | 12 ++----------
>>  drivers/mfd/lp8788.c   | 11 ++---------
>>  drivers/mfd/palmas.c   | 15 ++-------------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65086.c | 12 ++----------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 12 ++----------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 14 +++-----------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65218.c |  9 +++++----
>>  drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 12 ++----------
> 
> Are all of these drivers DT only?

At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers.
No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9.

> 
>>  9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> 
>