[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170605144459.GP3454@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:44:59 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
Amir Levy <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com,
Jared.Dominguez@...l.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/27] thunderbolt: Add new Thunderbolt PCI IDs
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:21:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 16:33 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:55:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > >
>
> > It turns out that this is not too big change after all so I think it
> > can
> > be included in the ICM patch if you want.
> >
> > Basically we would have module parameter:
> >
> > cm=auto|native|icm
> >
> > where auto is the default.
> >
> > Does that work?
>
>
> I remember Greg is opposite to being fan of module parameters in new
> code, so, please, if you are still going to do that, do it a separate
> patch which will be last in the series and can be discussed separately
> w.o. preventing everything else being applied.
Good point, thanks!
I'll add it as a separate patch then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists