linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.11 012/115] tipc: make macro tipc_wait_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  5 Jun 2017 18:16:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com>,
        Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 012/115] tipc: make macro tipc_wait_for_cond() smp safe

4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jon Paul Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>


[ Upstream commit 844cf763fba654436d3a4279b6a672c196cf1901 ]

The macro tipc_wait_for_cond() is embedding the macro sk_wait_event()
to fulfil its task. The latter, in turn, is evaluating the stated
condition outside the socket lock context. This is problematic if
the condition is accessing non-trivial data structures which may be
altered by incoming interrupts, as is the case with the cong_links()
linked list, used by socket to keep track of the current set of
congested links. We sometimes see crashes when this list is accessed
by a condition function at the same time as a SOCK_WAKEUP interrupt
is removing an element from the list.

We fix this by expanding selected parts of sk_wait_event() into the
outer macro, while ensuring that all evaluations of a given condition
are performed under socket lock protection.

Fixes: commit 365ad353c256 ("tipc: reduce risk of user starvation during link congestion")
Reviewed-by: Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/tipc/socket.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -361,25 +361,25 @@ static int tipc_sk_sock_err(struct socke
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define tipc_wait_for_cond(sock_, timeout_, condition_)			\
-({								        \
-	int rc_ = 0;							\
-	int done_ = 0;							\
-									\
-	while (!(condition_) && !done_) {				\
-		struct sock *sk_ = sock->sk;				\
-		DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait_, woken_wake_function);		\
-									\
-		rc_ = tipc_sk_sock_err(sock_, timeout_);		\
-		if (rc_)						\
-			break;						\
-		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk_), &wait_,			\
-				TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);			\
-		done_ = sk_wait_event(sk_, timeout_,			\
-				      (condition_), &wait_);		\
-		remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk_), &wait_);		\
-	}								\
-	rc_;								\
+#define tipc_wait_for_cond(sock_, timeo_, condition_)			       \
+({                                                                             \
+	struct sock *sk_;						       \
+	int rc_;							       \
+									       \
+	while ((rc_ = !(condition_))) {					       \
+		DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait_, woken_wake_function);	               \
+		sk_ = (sock_)->sk;					       \
+		rc_ = tipc_sk_sock_err((sock_), timeo_);		       \
+		if (rc_)						       \
+			break;						       \
+		prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk_), &wait_, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);    \
+		release_sock(sk_);					       \
+		*(timeo_) = wait_woken(&wait_, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, *(timeo_)); \
+		sched_annotate_sleep();				               \
+		lock_sock(sk_);						       \
+		remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk_), &wait_);		       \
+	}								       \
+	rc_;								       \
 })
 
 /**