linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 86/94] xfs: reserve enough blocks to handle btree splits when remapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170605153106.715411573@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  5 Jun 2017 18:18:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 86/94] xfs: reserve enough blocks to handle btree splits when remapping

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

commit fe0be23e68200573de027de9b8cc2b27e7fce35e upstream.

In xfs_reflink_end_cow, we erroneously reserve only enough blocks to
handle adding 1 extent.  This is problematic if we fragment free space,
have to do CoW, and then have to perform multiple bmap btree expansions.
Furthermore, the BUI recovery routine doesn't reserve /any/ blocks to
handle btree splits, so log recovery fails after our first error causes
the filesystem to go down.

Therefore, refactor the transaction block reservation macros until we
have a macro that works for our deferred (re)mapping activities, and fix
both problems by using that macro.

With 1k blocks we can hit this fairly often in g/187 if the scratch fs
is big enough.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_space.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++------
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c          |    5 ++++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c            |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_space.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_space.h
@@ -21,8 +21,20 @@
 /*
  * Components of space reservations.
  */
+
+/* Worst case number of rmaps that can be held in a block. */
 #define XFS_MAX_CONTIG_RMAPS_PER_BLOCK(mp)    \
 		(((mp)->m_rmap_mxr[0]) - ((mp)->m_rmap_mnr[0]))
+
+/* Adding one rmap could split every level up to the top of the tree. */
+#define XFS_RMAPADD_SPACE_RES(mp) ((mp)->m_rmap_maxlevels)
+
+/* Blocks we might need to add "b" rmaps to a tree. */
+#define XFS_NRMAPADD_SPACE_RES(mp, b)\
+	(((b + XFS_MAX_CONTIG_RMAPS_PER_BLOCK(mp) - 1) / \
+	  XFS_MAX_CONTIG_RMAPS_PER_BLOCK(mp)) * \
+	  XFS_RMAPADD_SPACE_RES(mp))
+
 #define XFS_MAX_CONTIG_EXTENTS_PER_BLOCK(mp)    \
 		(((mp)->m_alloc_mxr[0]) - ((mp)->m_alloc_mnr[0]))
 #define	XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp,w)	(XFS_BM_MAXLEVELS(mp,w) - 1)
@@ -30,13 +42,12 @@
 	(((b + XFS_MAX_CONTIG_EXTENTS_PER_BLOCK(mp) - 1) / \
 	  XFS_MAX_CONTIG_EXTENTS_PER_BLOCK(mp)) * \
 	  XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp,w))
+
+/* Blocks we might need to add "b" mappings & rmappings to a file. */
 #define XFS_SWAP_RMAP_SPACE_RES(mp,b,w)\
-	(((b + XFS_MAX_CONTIG_EXTENTS_PER_BLOCK(mp) - 1) / \
-	  XFS_MAX_CONTIG_EXTENTS_PER_BLOCK(mp)) * \
-	  XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp,w) + \
-	 ((b + XFS_MAX_CONTIG_RMAPS_PER_BLOCK(mp) - 1) / \
-	  XFS_MAX_CONTIG_RMAPS_PER_BLOCK(mp)) * \
-	  (mp)->m_rmap_maxlevels)
+	(XFS_NEXTENTADD_SPACE_RES((mp), (b), (w)) + \
+	 XFS_NRMAPADD_SPACE_RES((mp), (b)))
+
 #define	XFS_DAENTER_1B(mp,w)	\
 	((w) == XFS_DATA_FORK ? (mp)->m_dir_geo->fsbcount : 1)
 #define	XFS_DAENTER_DBS(mp,w)	\
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
 #include "xfs_bmap.h"
 #include "xfs_icache.h"
 #include "xfs_trace.h"
+#include "xfs_bmap_btree.h"
+#include "xfs_trans_space.h"
 
 
 kmem_zone_t	*xfs_bui_zone;
@@ -446,7 +448,8 @@ xfs_bui_recover(
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
-	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0, 0, 0, &tp);
+	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate,
+			XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK), 0, 0, &tp);
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 	budp = xfs_trans_get_bud(tp, buip);
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -736,8 +736,22 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow(
 	offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(ip->i_mount, offset);
 	end_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(ip->i_mount, offset + count);
 
-	/* Start a rolling transaction to switch the mappings */
-	resblks = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(ip->i_mount, XFS_DATA_FORK);
+	/*
+	 * Start a rolling transaction to switch the mappings.  We're
+	 * unlikely ever to have to remap 16T worth of single-block
+	 * extents, so just cap the worst case extent count to 2^32-1.
+	 * Stick a warning in just in case, and avoid 64-bit division.
+	 */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_RW_COUNT > UINT_MAX);
+	if (end_fsb - offset_fsb > UINT_MAX) {
+		error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+		xfs_force_shutdown(ip->i_mount, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE);
+		ASSERT(0);
+		goto out;
+	}
+	resblks = XFS_NEXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(ip->i_mount,
+			(unsigned int)(end_fsb - offset_fsb),
+			XFS_DATA_FORK);
 	error = xfs_trans_alloc(ip->i_mount, &M_RES(ip->i_mount)->tr_write,
 			resblks, 0, 0, &tp);
 	if (error)