[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170605153039.609864048@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 18:17:35 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@...onical.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 37/53] mm/migrate: fix refcount handling when !hugepage_migration_supported()
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
commit 30809f559a0d348c2dfd7ab05e9a451e2384962e upstream.
On failing to migrate a page, soft_offline_huge_page() performs the
necessary update to the hugepage ref-count.
But when !hugepage_migration_supported() , unmap_and_move_hugepage()
also decrements the page ref-count for the hugepage. The combined
behaviour leaves the ref-count in an inconsistent state.
This leads to soft lockups when running the overcommitted hugepage test
from mce-tests suite.
Soft offlining pfn 0x83ed600 at process virtual address 0x400000000000
soft offline: 0x83ed600: migration failed 1, type 1fffc00000008008 (uptodate|head)
INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Tasks blocked on level-0 rcu_node (CPUs 0-7): P2715
(detected by 7, t=5254 jiffies, g=963, c=962, q=321)
thugetlb_overco R running task 0 2715 2685 0x00000008
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x268
show_stack+0x24/0x30
sched_show_task+0x134/0x180
rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp+0x54/0x7c
rcu_check_callbacks+0xa74/0xb08
update_process_times+0x34/0x60
tick_sched_handle.isra.7+0x38/0x70
tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0x98
__hrtimer_run_queues+0xc0/0x300
hrtimer_interrupt+0xac/0x228
arch_timer_handler_phys+0x3c/0x50
handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x8c/0x290
generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
__handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb0
Address this by changing the putback_active_hugepage() in
soft_offline_huge_page() to putback_movable_pages().
This only triggers on systems that enable memory failure handling
(ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE) but not hugepage migration
(!ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION).
I imagine this wasn't triggered as there aren't many systems running
this configuration.
[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: remove dead comment, per Naoya]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525135146.32011-1-punit.agrawal@arm.com
Reported-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@...onical.com>
Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@...onical.com>
Suggested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1619,12 +1619,8 @@ static int soft_offline_huge_page(struct
if (ret) {
pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: migration failed %d, type %lx\n",
pfn, ret, page->flags);
- /*
- * We know that soft_offline_huge_page() tries to migrate
- * only one hugepage pointed to by hpage, so we need not
- * run through the pagelist here.
- */
- putback_active_hugepage(hpage);
+ if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
+ putback_movable_pages(&pagelist);
if (ret > 0)
ret = -EIO;
} else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists